From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:32:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7727EDB.62C0%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <935228.36209.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
hg export 20762 | patch -Rp1
hg export 20767 | patch -Rp1
...then rebuild and reinstall Xen and dom0 tools.
Afterwards, to revert the above:
hg diff | patch -Rp1
-- Keir
On 12/01/2010 18:34, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry, i need an exact commands to revert to two CSs.
> Googling doesn't help for sure. Otherwise , it doesn't make sense.
>
> Boris.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 11:59 AM
>>
>> Hm, nothing recent looks especially likely to cause this. Maybe c/s 20767,
>> if the format string it modifies is still incorrect after the change. It
>> might be interesting to revert 20767 and 20762 and see if the problem still
>> occurs.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>> On 12/01/2010 15:50, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com
>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > wrote:
>>
>>> I did clone of xen-unstable.hg about 10-12 days ago on the same box and it
>>> worked. That's one of the recent CSs.
>>>
>>> Boris.
>>>
>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> >
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@yahoo.com> >
>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> "
>>>> <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> >
>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 10:29 AM
>>>>
>>>> Any idea when this last worked in xen-unstable?
>>>>
>>>> -- Keir
>>>>
>>>> On 12/01/2010 15:18, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@yahoo.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attempt to load Xen 4.0-rc1 with 2..6.31.6 pvops kernel on top of Ubuntu
>>>>> 9.04
>>>>> server. ( Xen 3.4.3-rc1-pre loads fine with any kernel) :-
>>>>> dmesg :-
>>>>>
>>>>> . . . . . . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 499.890371] xend[1609]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895af sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 499.905480] xend[1612]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 499.934416] xend[1620]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 499.949121] xend[1623]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 499.988220] xend[1633]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 500.013995] xend[1641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 500.053252] xend[1652]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 500.069849] xend[1657]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 500.085520] xend[1660]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.907064] __ratelimit: 205 callbacks suppressed
>>>>> [ 504.907070] xend[2628]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.922303] xend[2631]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.937531] xend[2634]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.952277] xend[2638]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.966630] xend[2641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.981380] xend[2644]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 504.996759] xend[2647]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 505..012018] xend[2650]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9..so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 505.026693] xend[2653]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>> [ 505.041834] xend[2656]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>
>>>>> Boris.
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> > > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> > >
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>>>> To: "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@gmail.com </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail.com </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail.com> > >
>>>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > "
>>>>>> <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > >
>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:38 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel
>>>>>> includes
>>>>>> dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or
>>>>>> Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by
>>>>>> default
>>>>>> by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that
>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> mean you *have* to use it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Keir
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@gmail.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail.com </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail.com> >
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail..com </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail..com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail..com </mc/compose?to=sassyn@gmail..com> > >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel version
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> version support?
>>>>>>> Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub the
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> version from Jeremy branches?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default with
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
>>>>>>> But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a
>>>>>>> dom0
>>>>>>> support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> mainline?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have Xen
>>>>>>> Dom0
>>>>>>> support in the kernel mainline. see more here:
>>>>>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
>>>>>>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen..devel/75992>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open source
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> amazing virtualization system.
>>>>>>> Sassy
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@eu.citrix.com> >
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> > > >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and
>>>>>>>> published.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can grab it from here:
>>>>>>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1')
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please test it!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Keir
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> >
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > >
>>>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> >
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > >
>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> >
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-12 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 15:18 Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-12 15:29 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 15:50 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-12 16:59 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 18:34 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-12 19:32 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-01-12 19:52 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-12 21:09 ` Keir Fraser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-13 10:26 Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-13 10:37 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-13 11:03 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-13 17:53 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-01-12 7:33 Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 8:34 ` Andrew Lyon
2010-01-12 9:06 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 9:47 ` gilberto nunes
2010-01-12 10:06 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 10:25 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-12 10:50 ` gilberto nunes
2010-01-12 11:01 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 11:14 ` gilberto nunes
2010-01-12 11:31 ` Sassy Natan
2010-01-12 11:38 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 11:48 ` Sassy Natan
2010-01-12 11:51 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-12 12:02 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-01-15 0:54 ` Stefan Kuhne
2010-01-15 1:17 ` Stefan Kuhne
2010-01-15 1:19 ` Zhigang Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C7727EDB.62C0%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=bderzhavets@yahoo.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).