From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:27:24 +0000
Message-ID: <C77DDC8C.6F44%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4B582A24.5040701@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B582A24.5040701@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>, Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 21/01/2010 10:19, "Weidong Han" <weidong.han@intel.com> wrote:

>> Sorry this is typo.
>> I mean:
>> So, I think RMRR that has no-existent device is "invalid"
>> and whole RMRR should be ignored.
>>   
> looks reasonable.
> 
> Keir, I Acks Noboru's rmrr patch. Or do you want us to merge them to one
> patch?

Merge them up, re-send with both sign-off and acked-by all in one email.

 Thanks,
 Keir