From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Alexey Tumanov <atumanov@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: time freeze on save/restore, x86_64
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:09:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C798FB2E.9C73%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2453e2901002101551x124e6915n9f20919a22cc6c4b@mail.gmail.com>
Is behaviour different if you put a line 'tsc_mode=2' in your domain config
file as passed to 'xm create'?
-- Keir
On 10/02/2010 23:51, "Alexey Tumanov" <atumanov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running xen-unstable c/s 19603 with a single 2.6.18.8-xen kernel image
> used for both dom0 and domUs. I'm experiencing a time freeze when I restore a
> domU checkpoint file on another physical host. Basically, both date (referring
> to /etc/localtime) and gettimeofday() (issuing a gettimeofday syscall)
> repeatedly report unchanging values for tens of seconds:
> debian:/var/tmp# ./timer
> time: sec=1265844232, usec=728054
> debian:/var/tmp# ./timer
> time: sec=1265844232, usec=728054
> debian:/var/tmp# ./timer
> time: sec=1265844232, usec=728054
> debian:/var/tmp# date
> Wed Feb 10 23:23:52 UTC 2010
> debian:/var/tmp# date
> Wed Feb 10 23:23:52 UTC 2010
> debian:/var/tmp# date
> Wed Feb 10 23:23:52 UTC 2010
>
> The timer (TSC??) springs back to life after 20-30 seconds.
> Hardware: Sun Fire X2250, 2 socket, quad-core = total of 8 execution threads.
> Processor: Intel Xeon E5472 @ 3GHz
> Arch: x86_64
>
> I've seen some discussion about TSC skew, and tried setting clocksource to
> acpi instead of the default hpet - didn't help. I also tried echoing "1" to
> /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock to no avail. Finally, no luck debugging
> with xen gdb, because setting a breakpoint in do_gettimeofday is futile - it
> fires non-stop.
>
> Does anybody have any suggestions? In my case, it is not just a TSC skew - the
> clock stalls for quite an extended period of time, while the restored VM is
> otherwise operational and responds to all sorts of commands unless they
> execute anything that translates into a nanosleep syscall. The latter, of
> course, won't return until the clock starts going again.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-10 23:51 time freeze on save/restore, x86_64 Alexey Tumanov
2010-02-11 0:09 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-02-11 0:20 ` Alexey Tumanov
2010-02-11 0:32 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-11 0:22 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-02-11 0:32 ` Alexey Tumanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C798FB2E.9C73%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=atumanov@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).