From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from \_PR to \_SB
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:36:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C799FEA2.9E37%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB8593BCECAB3D40A8248BE0B6400A3845F38C0D@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 11/02/2010 17:38, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from \_PR to \_SB
>
> Move processor from \_PR to \_SB. ACPI processor can be defined under
> \_PR or \_SB. However, recently os like linux 2.6.30/32 support cpu hotplug
> better for \_SB processor object.
What's 'better' about it? I don't want to mess with that kind of thing right
now unless there's a good reason. In my experience the majority of systems
still define a \_PR block -- is Linux having some kind of problem with all
of them?
-- Keir
> Signed-off-by: Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
> Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 17:38 [PATCH 1/2] Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from \_PR to \_SB Liu, Jinsong
2010-02-11 18:36 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-02-12 2:57 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-02-12 8:30 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-12 9:25 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-02-12 9:30 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-12 9:38 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-02-12 9:50 ` Liu, Jinsong
2010-02-12 10:03 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-12 10:07 ` Liu, Jinsong
2010-02-12 10:29 ` Keir Fraser
2010-02-12 20:46 ` Liu, Jinsong
2010-02-12 21:57 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C799FEA2.9E37%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yunhong.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).