From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from
	\_PR to \_SB
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:36:18 +0000
Message-ID: <C799FEA2.9E37%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <EB8593BCECAB3D40A8248BE0B6400A3845F38C0D@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB8593BCECAB3D40A8248BE0B6400A3845F38C0D@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/02/2010 17:38, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> Vcpu hotplug: Move ACPI processor from \_PR to \_SB
> 
> Move processor from \_PR to \_SB. ACPI processor can be defined under
> \_PR or \_SB. However, recently os like linux 2.6.30/32 support cpu hotplug
> better for \_SB processor object.

What's 'better' about it? I don't want to mess with that kind of thing right
now unless there's a good reason. In my experience the majority of systems
still define a \_PR block -- is Linux having some kind of problem with all
of them?

 -- Keir

> Signed-off-by: Jiang, Yunhong   <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>
>                      Liu, Jinsong     <jinsong.liu@intel.com>