From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: remus build error
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:44:07 +0000
Message-ID: <C79A38B7.9E68%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <20100211201349.GA16157@kremvax.cs.ubc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100211201349.GA16157@kremvax.cs.ubc.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Brendan Cully <brendan@cs.ubc.ca>
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/02/2010 20:13, "Brendan Cully" <brendan@cs.ubc.ca> wrote:

>>>> No hunks of that patch applied at all, to xen-unstable tip. Weird. Try
>>>> again. :-)
>>> 
>>> It was against linux-2.6.18-xen, not xen-unstable.
>> 
>> Argh.
> 
> Does that mean you'd prefer a patch to buildconfigs/enable-xen-config
> in xen-unstable? It wasn't clear to me which was better.

It means I totally missed that the patch applied to the Linux repo, even
though your original email stated it. I did expect a patch to
enable-xen-config, but I don't much mind either way. I applied your original
patch now, anyway.

 -- Keir