From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: increasing the number of guests (NR_DYNIRQS)
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:40:27 +0000
Message-ID: <C7A596CB.AD03%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <m3pr40tbyd.fsf@luke.xen.prgmr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3pr40tbyd.fsf@luke.xen.prgmr.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Luke S Crawford <lsc@prgmr.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 20/02/2010 10:53, "Luke S Crawford" <lsc@prgmr.com> wrote:

> two questions:  first, is this stupid?  domains appear to be working, and
> I'm currently running north of 200 guests on the server.
> 
> second, if this is indeed the right way to fix the problem, if I
> submitted a CONFIG_NR_DYNIRQS patch as Kier suggested in the referenced
> post, would that be considered for acceptance upstream?

Yes, I'd take that for the 2.6.18 tree.

 -- Keir