From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: live migration fails (assert in shadow_hash_delete) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:59:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20100223104613.GQ368@whitby.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100223104613.GQ368@whitby.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Tim Deegan , Devdutt Patnaik , Ian Jackson Cc: Ashish Bijlani , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/02/2010 10:46, "Tim Deegan" wrote: > At 10:19 +0000 on 23 Feb (1266920353), Devdutt Patnaik wrote: >> We just used the xen-unstable version from 2 weeks ago, and haven't really >> modified it. >> We tried this with 64-bit versions of 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.32.8 DomU kernels. > > OK. This really needs to be fixed to the 4.0 release. Keir, have we > had any other testing on 64-bit PV live migrations? Localhost migrations were just added to the automated tests. But I think maybe they are trivially failing due to trying to do them via the 'xl' interface, which doesn't support it(!). Ian? In short, there's probably been little or no testing of live migration in the recent past, as I don't think Intel tests it either. -- Keir