From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: New release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 (RC9) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:13:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4BB32B62.4000408@invisiblethingslab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BB32B62.4000408@invisiblethingslab.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Joanna Rutkowska Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 31/03/2010 12:00, "Joanna Rutkowska" wrote: > BTW, on this page: > > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ > > one can see linux-2.6.18-xen.hg repo as a sub-repo of the just-created > xen-4.0-testing.hg... I was under impression that 4.0 would be using > pvops0 kernel *only* and that you would not support 2.6.18 anymore for > this hypervisor... > > Can you shed some light on this issue -- why is this kernel repo there, > and what kernel will *really* be the official and stable option for Xen > 4? What will be part of the next week release? The Xen source repo will build pv_ops by default. You can use whatever kernel you like as dom0/domU: that's not really an aspect of the release. -- Keir