From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@gmail.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Stephen Spector <stephen.spector@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 4.1 Feature Request List
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:07:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7E2888E.100F1%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBCBE3C.8030203@goop.org>
On 07/04/2010 18:17, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>> 1. Nesting
>> 1. As silly as this feature sounds it may be why I leave Xen
>> for KVM. This would be useful for teaching management of
>> VMs. A student could have a Dom0 and start up DomUs inside
>> it without each on needing their own physical machine.
>>
>
> Xen nests OK, so long as you're happy running purely PV guests within
> the inner Xen.
There are patches imminently incoming to do this for HVM-on-HVM, for AMD SVM
at least.
-- Keir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 17:41 Xen 4.1 Feature Request List Stephen Spector
2010-04-06 19:10 ` [Xen-users] " David Markey
2010-04-07 11:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-04-07 11:15 ` Grant McWilliams
2010-04-07 11:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-04-07 11:27 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-07 13:06 ` David Markey
2010-04-07 14:07 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-04-07 11:13 ` Grant McWilliams
2010-04-07 14:51 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-07 20:59 ` Grant McWilliams
2010-04-07 21:04 ` [Xen-users] " Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-07 17:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-07 18:07 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-04-07 13:51 ` Jeff Sturm
2010-04-08 12:33 ` Fantu
2010-04-08 17:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-08 18:23 ` Fantu
2010-04-08 18:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-04-08 19:00 ` Thomas Goirand
2010-04-08 19:46 ` Some test results on Xen 4.0 and 2.6.31 / 2.6.32 pvops kernels Carsten Schiers
2010-04-08 20:12 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-10 9:26 ` AW: " Carsten Schiers
2010-04-12 7:59 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-04-08 20:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-04-10 16:07 ` Xen 4.1 Feature Request List Christian Tramnitz
2010-04-10 2:09 ` Vincent, Pradeep
2010-04-20 10:32 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C7E2888E.100F1%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=grantmasterflash@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=stephen.spector@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).