xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Alex Williams <awilliams@iweb.com>,
	"Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Possible regression: XEN 4.0.0 total_memory decrease
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:33:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7ECFE6F.116A2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC736C7.6080707@iweb.com>

Are the hypervisor and dom0 kernel 64-bit or 32-bit? Xen prints a message
"System RAM: xxx" early during boot. Do these differ significantly for you
between 3.4.2 and 4.0.0?

 K.

On 15/04/2010 16:54, "Alex Williams" <awilliams@iweb.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I noticed a significant *decrease* (150MB) in "total_memory" on a host
> build using XEN 4.0.0 with kernel 2.6.18.
> 
> Here are the details:
> 
> Server = 4096MB RAM
> XEN 3.4.2 + kernel 2.6.18: xm info | grep total_memory = 4084
> XEN 4.0.0 + kernel 2.6.18: xm info | grep total_memory = 3946
> 
> The exact same kernel config file was used for both builds. I also made
> sure there is absolutely no difference on the hosts (while the builds
> are created on a different machine).
> 
> This seems like a regression, unless someone can provide suggestions on
> how to correct this?
> 
> Thanks.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-15 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-15 15:54 Possible regression: XEN 4.0.0 total_memory decrease Alex Williams
2010-04-15 16:33 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-04-15 17:33   ` Alex Williams
2010-04-15 17:42     ` Alex Williams
2010-04-15 18:05     ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-15 18:23       ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-16  7:53         ` Jan Beulich
2010-04-16 17:37           ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-19  7:35             ` Jan Beulich
2010-04-19  7:51               ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-15 18:26       ` Alex Williams
2010-04-15 18:34         ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C7ECFE6F.116A2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=awilliams@iweb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).