From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Florian Wagner <f_wagner@syscomp.de>,
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Sixth (and final?) release candidate for Xen 3.4.3
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 09:05:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C80AD9DE.13B81%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE49E3F.7080608@goop.org>
On 08/05/2010 00:11, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>>> As I know, you have to backport extra Csets like 28089, 21092, and 21161
>>> from
>>> xen-unstable.hg to make it work well with latest pv_ops kernel except the
>>> Csets Keir had indicated.
>>>
>> Doesn't sound like 3.4.3 is going to support pv_ops then.
>>
>
> Florian and M A Young have reported success with 3.4.3-rc, so it isn't
> completely non-functional. How essential are those changes? 28089
> doesn't appear in my tree ("abort: unknown revision '28089'"), but 21092
> ("Allow all unused GSI to be configured via IO-APIC by new pv_ops dom0")
> and 21161 ("Make c/s 21089 work again with c/s 21092") both look pertient.
I doubt anyone is running pv_ops dom0 in serious production uses yet. So I'm
not sure backporting this sort of stuff to our very stable branch is really
necessary. Anyone running pv_ops dom0 is likely not scared of Xen 4.0.
-- Keir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-08 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 12:00 Sixth (and final?) release candidate for Xen 3.4.3 Keir Fraser
2010-05-05 9:50 ` M A Young
2010-05-06 14:13 ` M A Young
2010-05-06 14:26 ` Keir Fraser
2010-05-06 16:13 ` M A Young
2010-05-06 16:34 ` Keir Fraser
2010-05-07 2:03 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2010-05-07 7:10 ` Keir Fraser
2010-05-07 23:11 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-08 8:05 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-05-08 11:00 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-08 15:14 ` Errors when loading 2.6.32.12 under Xen 4.0 on ASUS P5Q-E Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-12 17:50 ` Sixth (and final?) release candidate for Xen 3.4.3 Langsdorf, Mark
2010-05-12 19:21 ` Keir Fraser
2010-05-12 19:42 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2010-05-06 18:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-06 19:13 ` M A Young
2010-05-06 20:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-07 18:33 ` M A Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C80AD9DE.13B81%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=f_wagner@syscomp.de \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).