From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Shall we clear the cpumap in XEN_DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 08:43:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731E5F20AF@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731E5F20AF@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Jiang, Yunhong" Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/05/2010 08:22, "Jiang, Yunhong" wrote: > When browse code, I noticed if the op->u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap is NULL, a random > value of new_affinity will be passed to vcpu_set_affinity(), as in followed > code. > > I'm not sure if this is expected result. IMO, we should return -EINVAL if no > cpu specified, as the return value at vcpu_set_affinity() for empty cpumap. Xen-unstable:21350. Thanks, Keir > Did I missed anything? > > case XEN_DOMCTL_getvcpuaffinity: > { > domid_t dom = op->domain; > struct domain *d = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(dom); > struct vcpu *v; > cpumask_t new_affinity; > ...... > if ( op->cmd == XEN_DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity ) > { > xenctl_cpumap_to_cpumask( >>>>> the new_affinity is not > initialized for if cpumap==NULL > &new_affinity, &op->u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap); > ret = vcpu_set_affinity(v, &new_affinity); > } > > Thanks > --jyh