From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 18:19:02 +0100
Message-ID: <C825B996.16433%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <681ea80b-75c6-41cc-a13d-3c7e25721f99@default>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <681ea80b-75c6-41cc-a13d-3c7e25721f99@default>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, "Xen-Devel (xen-devel@lists.xensource.com)" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pr>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 28/05/2010 17:36, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com> wrote:

>> Anyhow, retreading this argument is not going to be fruitful
>> It's fair to
>> say that your definition is now also Xen's definition.
> 
> Sorry, I'm not trying to beat a dead horse.  I'm just
> playing whack-a-mole and repeating arguments for a
> new audience and a new corner case.  If you prefer, I
> can take that offlist.

No, that's fine. And in general, supporting both the consistent-TSC and
fast-TSC cases (the latter including perhaps a more-Xen-features subcase as
well) as configurable options is good. Those who care will know how they
want to set the options.

 -- Keir