From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xc: deal with xen/evtchn and xen/gntdev
	device names
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:01:51 +0100
Message-ID: <C82E8D9F.16AB3%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <1275645308.24218.34883.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1275645308.24218.34883.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 04/06/2010 10:55, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:

>>> If so I think that's an argument for propagating the removal of this
>>> functionality into stable trees sooner rather than later rather than
>>> papering over the craziness for even longer.
> 
> Keir has applied my patch so I'll keep an eye out for fallout and
> suggest it for backporting to the stable branch when it looks like we've
> gotten away with it.

Any fallout should be dealt with by getting users to set up proper udev
rules, I'm sure. I backported to 4.0 for 4.0.1, so I have confidence. ;-)

 -- Keir