From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: New feature support - xl or xm ? Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:19:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <001201cb08d7$d2caad80$78600880$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <001201cb08d7$d2caad80$78600880$@com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: AP Xen , Stefano Stabellini , "'Vincent, Pradeep'" Cc: Ian, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Jackson , 'Dulloor' List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/06/2010 21:02, "AP Xen" wrote: >> We like the 'xm' CLI, in fact we are trying our best to provide a >> compatible command line interface with 'xl'. >> Ideally you'll be able to symlink xl to xm and everything will still >> work. If you find any problem with command line incompatibilities >> please let us know, and we'll fix them. >> >> On the other hand if you are speaking about the XML-RPC interface >> provided by xend, that is a totally different matter. > > So with xl, xend doesn't need to be running as it uses the libxl API which > bypasses libxenguest/xend? All correct, except libxl does use libxenctrl and libxenguest. But it does not use xend and so does not need it to be running. -- Keir