From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe xenfs if it not be loaded
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:33:31 +0100
Message-ID: <C8458B2B.2D4F%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4C1FC7D8.3080101@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C1FC7D8.3080101@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Yu Zhiguo <yuzg@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 21/06/2010 21:13, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

>> Should I leave tools patches unapplied for a week, perhaps?
> 
> You mean the policy is that if a patch is not interesting enough to draw
> comment, you'll accept it by default after a week?  What about waiting
> until there are either positive or negative comments, and suggesting the
> poster ping if the patch is uncommented on after a day or two?

Well, possibly. I think that will leave a lot of patches unapplied. Perhaps
that is for the best, of course.

 -- Keir