From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Xen ARINC 653 Scheduler (updated to add support for CPU pools) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:36:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Kathy Hadley , George Dunlap Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org I've just built latest xen-unstable.hg and linux-2.6.18-xen.hg and booted a domU just fine. All my builds are 64-bit though whereas yours are 32-bit. I suppose that could cause a difference (in particular, 32-bit hypervisor is less tested by people). -- Keir On 23/06/2010 22:16, "Kathy Hadley" wrote: > Keir, > I see this same behavior when I run the credit scheduler. It doesn't > look like it's localized to the scheduler I'm working on. I pulled the > latest code from http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg and > rebuilt the kernel earlier today, with no effect. > > Note that I can successfully start the domain with Xen-3.4.1 and > Xen-4.0.0, using the same configuration file as I am using with > xen-unstable. > > Kathy > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 4:23 PM >> To: Kathy Hadley; George Dunlap >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Xen ARINC 653 Scheduler (updated >> to add support for CPU pools) >> >> On 23/06/2010 20:57, "Kathy Hadley" >> wrote: >> >>> Call Trace: >>> [] hypercall_page+0x3a7 <-- >>> [] raw_safe_halt+0xa5 >>> [] xen_idle+0x49 >>> [] cpu_idle+0x8d >>> [] start_kernel+0x3f5 >>> [] do_early_param+0x80 >>> >>> Does this shed any light on the situation? >> >> Looks like you're in the idle loop. So, no, it doesn't really shed > much >> useful light. >> >> -- Keir >> >