From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Do we need consider PAE when implement APEI-ERST feature? Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 05:13:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Liu, Jinsong" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" Cc: "Jiang, Yunhong" , "Li, Xin" , "Nakajima, Jun" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/07/2010 03:47, "Liu, Jinsong" wrote: > Recently we are implement Xen APEI-ERST feature which is used to save/restore > key platform error info before/after system crash/reboot. > APEI-ERST is a new ACPI freature, only supported by latest Intel platform > (x86-64). > > My question is, do we need consider PAE when implement APEI-ERST feature? any > strong reason? Is there any particular reason it would be x86_64-specific? Supporting PAE hosts with the new feature isn't essential however. -- Keir