From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:54:18 +0100
Message-ID: <C87DFA3A.1C97C%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <AANLkTimKJogS0m2HN53KK-6_c-CnzBqqF0Udp8BFsRCh@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimKJogS0m2HN53KK-6_c-CnzBqqF0Udp8BFsRCh@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Dulloor <dulloor@gmail.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/08/2010 16:43, "Dulloor" <dulloor@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Do you think the <start,end> ranges are also unnecessary, and
>> could really be replaced by just a size? I asked for that to be changed the
>> other way last time round.
> Actually, we don't need <start, end> ranges, since the nodes are always
> contiguous, which could be made implicit in domain builders (hvmloader
> and PV enlightenment).
> But, your previous suggestion to use <start, end> ranges could still
> be seen as style/consistency thing,
> which could be important in interfaces. Your pick :)

I think <start,end> is clearer.

 -- Keir