From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:45:29 +0100
Message-ID: <C87EE739.1CA0C%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4C591046.4070201@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C591046.4070201@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, Dulloor <dulloor@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 04/08/2010 08:01, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@amd.com> wrote:

>>> So long as it gets renamed to 'node_id' in the info structure I'm okay with
>>> it. That doesn't preclude simply setting that field to 0...nr_vnodes-1 and
>>> doing translation in the hypervisor, but also leaves us a bit of
>>> flexibility.
>> Yes, I like this idea. Will do that.
> Ack, that sounds good. So we have virtual nodes, virtual physical nodes
> and machine nodes.

The index into the 'node table' in the informational structure would have no
particular relevance in this scheme.

 -- Keir