From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] Nested Virtualization: localevent Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:19:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Christoph Egger , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org I seem to remember we discussed the reason for this a bit some time ago. It looked to me like you were calling a function that makes sense only on a running guest (and a locally currently running guest at that) after the guest was dead, during cleanup/teardown. If I'm remebering correctly then the fix would be to not do that then. ;-) -- Keir On 05/08/2010 16:46, "Keir Fraser" wrote: > The functions are called local_event_delivery* because they implicitly act > on current. They don't need to take a vcpu parameter. If you find you need a > vcpu parameter then you are using them, or one of their callers, > incorrectly. > > -- Keir > > On 05/08/2010 16:00, "Christoph Egger" wrote: > >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel