From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] Nested Virtualization: tools
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:21:44 +0100
Message-ID: <C880A3A8.1CE51%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <201008051659.50953.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008051659.50953.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

This, and any other patch that obviously sets up common non-vendor-specific
nesting logic, needs an ack from the Intel devs (e.g., Eddie Dong who I am
ccing here). I would/will require the same vice versa too, when Intel repost
their patches. There is obviously a common element of both patch series that
needs to be pulled out and agreed in common.

 -- Keir

On 05/08/2010 15:59, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>