From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] Nested Virtualization: localevent Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:21:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <201008101001.29449.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201008101001.29449.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Christoph Egger Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/08/2010 09:01, "Christoph Egger" wrote: >> Ah, this is the crux of it. You shouldn't need to stgi from the vcpu >> destructor. It makes no sense and doing it shouldn't leave you with a >> zombie domain. > > I backed out the 'localevent' patch in my local tree, removed the stgi > call in the vcpu destructor and run tests. A lot of things have been > changed since the issue has been found and the real bug might have > already been fixed in the meantime. > > I haven't seen any issues with that changes in my tests so my next > patch series I send will have the localevent patch and the stgi call > dropped. Thanks. I applied the p2m infrastructure patch that Tim acked, by the way. Also may as well give Intel a little longer to respond on the common infrastructure patches. -- keir