From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC]PLE's performance enhancement through improving scheduler.
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:39:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C8913ECF.1E39F%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E164C8CB771@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 18/08/2010 06:51, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> The attached patch is just for RFC, not for check-in. Recently, we are working
> on enhancing the hardware feature PLE through improving scheduler in Xen, and
> the attached patch can improve system's throughput significantly. With
> standand virtualization benchmark(vConsolidate), the testing result shows
> ~20% performance gain. In the implemenation, there are two points to enhance
> the system's scheduler.
> The first one is that when PLE vmexit occurs, scheduler de-schedules the vcpu
> and put it in the second position of the runq instead of moving it to the tail
> of runq so that it can be re-scheduled in a very short time. In this case, it
> can improve scheduler's faireness and make the PLE-senstive guests allocated
> with reasonable timeslice. The other improvement is to boost other vcpus'
> priority of the same guest through moving them to the head of the runq when
> PLE vmexit happens with one vcpu of the guest. And we are also improving the
> implementation to make it more robust and more pervasive, but before the work
> is done, we also want to collect your guys' ideas and suggestions about it ?
> Any comment is very appreciated!. Thanks!
> Xiantao
Please Cc George Dunlap on scheduler work.
-- Keir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-18 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-18 5:51 [RFC]PLE's performance enhancement through improving scheduler Zhang, Xiantao
2010-08-18 6:39 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-08-18 9:16 ` George Dunlap
2010-08-19 1:57 ` Zhang, Xiantao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C8913ECF.1E39F%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).