From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: oxenstored in stubdom ?
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:23:02 +0100
Message-ID: <C8969CF6.1EB2E%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4C70D2F0.8080507@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C70D2F0.8080507@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@eu.citrix.com>, =?ISO-8859-2?B?o3VrYXN6?= =?ISO-8859-2?B?IE9sZbY=?= <lukaszoles@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 22/08/2010 08:34, "Vincent Hanquez" <vincent.hanquez@eu.citrix.com>
wrote:

>> So.. having xenstore in separate domain can have other advantages
>> (performance?).
>> Is it (or will be) possible  run oxenstroed in stubdomain?
> 
> oxenstored is already restartable (or used to be and easy to fix if it
> was broken), so from a xenstore point of view, you could already restart
> dom0; Obviously this would block all the domains that try to do a
> xenstore query, but if the dom0 is restarted quickly enough this
> shouldn't be too noticeable since a normal working domain shouldn't use
> much xenstore after starting up.

So that's "very probably restartable" then? ;-)

 -- Keir