From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: Re: common time reference between domU and dom0
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:45:39 +0000
Message-ID: <C927B553.C5BB%keir@xen.org>
References: <4D01FF82.5000106@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D01FF82.5000106@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 10/12/2010 10:22, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/10/2010 11:20 AM, James Harper wrote:
>> Is that a new call? I don't see it mentioned in 4.0-testing anywhere.
>> 
>> Is there a fallback if HVMOP_get_time doesn't exist?
> 
> Not really, but it is really an easy backport to your hypervisor.  It
> will even be in RHEL5.6/CentOS 5.6.

It's probably worth backporting for 4.0.2 too.

 -- Keir

> Paolo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel