From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] remove unneeded test for cpu in cpupool
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:14:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C9A64C13.14E40%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D8092BB.4030006@ts.fujitsu.com>
On 16/03/2011 10:36, "Juergen Gross" <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On 03/16/11 11:13, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 16/03/2011 06:34, "Juergen Gross"<juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> attached patch removes an unneeded check in vcpu_migrate().
>>>
>>> Andre, could you please give it a try on your 48 core machine with
>>>
>>> xl cpupool-numa-split
>>>
>>> I'd like to make sure the check is really not needed. On my machines it
>>> worked
>>> okay, but your machine seems to trigger races more easily.
>>
>> Could you BUG_ON failing this test when we exit the retry loop? It seems a
>> suitable loop post-condition.
>
> Not easily. The cpu_valid mask of a cpupool might change between the call of
> pick_cpu and the test. In the normal case this is okay, as removing a cpu
> from a cpupool (which is the critical case) will call cpu_disable_scheduler()
> after removing the cpu from the mask, which will migrate the vcpu away.
>
> Using a saved copy of cpu_valid for the test isn't working either, if a cpu
> is added to and removed from the cpupool in a very short time. I would have
> to use a generation count for the cpu_valid mask and do the check only if
> the count didn't change. I think this is little bit of overkill here, but if
> you'd prefer it, I can do a patch.
Ah no, if it's more subtle than it appears, and it's not a straighjtforward
post-condition, then I wouldn't bother.
-- Keir
>
> Juergen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-16 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 6:34 [Patch] remove unneeded test for cpu in cpupool Juergen Gross
2011-03-16 10:13 ` Keir Fraser
2011-03-16 10:36 ` Juergen Gross
2011-03-16 11:14 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C9A64C13.14E40%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@amd.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).