From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: CPU notifiers must not be registered
	a second time during resume
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:11:51 +0000
Message-ID: <C9A942D7.150C2%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <4D8397FA0200007800037494@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D8397FA0200007800037494@vpn.id2.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Jinsong Liu <jinsong.liu@intel.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 18/03/2011 16:35, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

>> if ( !early_init_done ) {
>>  BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
>>  ...
>>  early_init_done = 1;
>> }
>> 
>> It's clearer anyway -- we're simply protecting one-time-only early-boot-time
>> initialisation stuff.
> 
> What's wrong with doing the protection by passing down the
> necessary information?

Hm, yes, fair enough, I'll apply it.

 -- Keir