From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
Cc: "'xen-devel@lists.xensource.com'" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTRR: clear DramModEn bit of sys_cfg MSR
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:12:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C9C11A27.15E85%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9B50D2.8040900@amd.com>
Looks good, thanks!
-- Keir
On 05/04/2011 18:26, "Wei Huang" <wei.huang2@amd.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the indention issue... I agree that it is better to move
> check-and_fixup code to init_amd() function. See the new patch.
>
> My understanding is that RdMem and WrMem are never going to become 1:
> BIOS are supposed to set sys_cfg[DramModEn] bit to 0 before OS takes
> over. As a result, RdMem and WrMem are read as 0 in fixed MTRRs. Unless
> Xen turn these bits to 1 (which I don't see from the code),
> k8_enable_fixed_iorrs() is useless. My 2nd patch removes
> k8_enable_fixed_iorrs(). If you have concern, we don't have to apply
> this patch. But I don't think we shouldn't move it to amd.c.
> k8_enable_fixed_iorrs() is unrelated in that file.
>
> Thanks,
> -Wei
>
> On 04/05/2011 06:51 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 04/04/2011 23:23, "Wei Huang"<wei.huang2@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Some buggy BIOS might set sys_cfg DramModEn bit to 1, which can cause
>>> unexpected behavior on AMD platforms. This patch clears DramModEn bit.
>>> The patch was derived from upstream kernel patch (see
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11425/).
>> This patch also removes k8_enable_fixed_iorrs(), and it's not clear why.
>> That would at least belong in a separate patch, but I would think we don't
>> want to delete that code anyway.
>>
>> The indentation is wrong (spaces in a file that is hard-tab-indented). And
>> the printk is probably unnecessary -- at most you should print it once
>> rather than potentially for every core brought up.
>>
>> But further, I don't see why you need to hang off {get,set}_fixed_ranges at
>> all. Why not do this check-and-fixup in cpu/amd.c:init_amd()? It's a handy
>> early-cpu-bringup amd-specific function which is rather designed ofr this
>> kind of purpose. The k8_enable_fixed_iorrs() work could better be done in
>> the same place, too (perhaps move it in a separate patch?).
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang<wei.huang2@amd.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-04 22:23 [PATCH] MTRR: clear DramModEn bit of sys_cfg MSR Wei Huang
2011-04-05 11:51 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-05 17:26 ` Wei Huang
2011-04-05 18:12 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C9C11A27.15E85%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).