From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>,
Haitao Shan <maillists.shan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>,
Donald D Dugger <donald.d.dugger@intel.com>,
Xin Li <xin.li@intel.com>, Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Re: system freeze when processor.ko is loaded during boot
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:59:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C9CA1962.2C95F%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D99A9F20200007800039CFB@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On 04/04/2011 10:22, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> Haitao, while it is quite clear that with the current
> implementation we just can't use C states above C1 on CPUs
> that may halt the TSC in C2 or C3 *and* that don't allow
> writing the full TSC, this family/model based determination
> clearly isn't nice (and since it is a white list, it can't possibly be
> complete). An alternative would seem to be to probe for how
> TSC writes behave (thus at once covering eventual other
> vendors' CPUs that may have similar shortcomings). That of
> course would need to be done early, so that resetting the
> upper bits to zero wouldn't have any adverse effect. What
> do you think?
We should do early run-time test of this from the BSP then, on failure,
avoid all further potential uses of write_tsc() in an appropriate way (e.g.,
bail early in cstate_restore_tsc(), synchronize_tsc_*(), and avoid use of
time_calibration_tsc_rendezvous()).
-- Keir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 20:04 system freeze when processor.ko is loaded during boot Martin Wilck
2010-10-20 6:57 ` Jan Beulich
2010-11-04 14:57 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2010-11-23 23:16 ` Martin Wilck
2011-01-10 15:37 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-01-13 21:29 ` Martin Wilck
2011-01-14 7:53 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-03-18 3:40 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-01-11 14:29 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-03-28 22:31 ` Martin Wilck
2011-03-28 22:48 ` Martin Wilck
2011-03-31 11:48 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-01 2:26 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-03-31 6:23 ` Haitao Shan
2011-04-03 13:46 ` Martin Wilck
2011-04-04 9:22 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-06 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-12 13:59 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2011-04-12 14:12 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-31 9:52 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C9CA1962.2C95F%keir@xen.org \
--to=keir@xen.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=maillists.shan@gmail.com \
--cc=mwilck@arcor.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=xin.li@intel.com \
--cc=yunhong.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).