xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	"winston.l.wang" <winston.l.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: don't write_tsc() non-zero values on CPUs updating only the lower 32 bits
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:40:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C9CDA6D0.16614%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a5514b0-b3d6-478a-9434-b80758a7445d@default>

On 14/04/2011 23:41, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com> wrote:

>> Yeah, if we want to continue to try avoiding write_tsc() on
>> TSC_RELIABLE
>> then we should assert !TSC_RELIABLE on the write_tsc() path in
>> cstate_tsc_restore().
> 
> Agreed.  In fact, maybe it should be asserted in write_tsc?

We still write_tsc on CPU physical hot-add.

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-15  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14  7:18 [PATCH] x86: don't write_tsc() non-zero values on CPUs updating only the lower 32 bits Jan Beulich
2011-04-14  7:25 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14  7:42   ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-14  7:50     ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14  8:06       ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-14  9:18         ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14 22:41           ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-04-15  6:40             ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2011-04-15 14:34               ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-04-15 17:28                 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14  7:28 ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-14 16:05 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14 16:28   ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-14 16:48     ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14 18:33       ` Wang, Winston L
2011-04-14 21:06         ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14 21:37           ` Wang, Winston L
2011-04-15  7:06           ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-15  7:08       ` Jan Beulich
2011-04-15  7:37         ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-15 14:49           ` Wang, Winston L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C9CDA6D0.16614%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=winston.l.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).