From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Performance difference between Xen versions Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 09:49:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4DBE6A1C.2040107@ts.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DBE6A1C.2040107@ts.fujitsu.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Juergen Gross , Jan Beulich Cc: Keir Fraser , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/05/2011 09:23, "Juergen Gross" wrote: > On 05/02/11 10:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 02.05.11 at 10:00, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On the long run I'd like to make the cpufreq governor a feature of the >>> cpupool. This would enable an administrator of a large Xen machine >>> with a heterogeneous load to specify which domains should run at >>> full speed and which are allowed to save energy at the cost of latency. >>> >>> What do you think? >> Certainly an interesting idea, with the question of how an implementation >> of this would look like. > > Let me do some research work first :-) > I hope to make a proposal soon. I think it's a good idea, and it should be quite possible to implement cleanly. -- Keir