From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: xl/xm save -c fails - set_vcpucontext EOPNOTSUPP (was Re:
	xl save -c issues with Windows 7 Ultimate)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:10:17 +0100
Message-ID: <C9F15479.2D2C3%keir@xen.org>
References: <4DCA5B3A0200007800040EC4@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCA5B3A0200007800040EC4@vpn.id2.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, rshriram@cs.ubc.ca
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/05/2011 08:47, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

> The question is whether there are other inconsistencies lurking, and
> hence whether it wouldn't be better to mark a vCPU on which setting
> the context failed, not allowing it to resume or have its context
> obtained anymore. That appears quite drastic though - Keir, what's
> your opinion here?

Hm, I think overall we just need to get the error-path handling in this
function correct. I think it'll be a bit ugly to kludge around that.

 -- Keir