From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nestedsvm: ns_vmcb -> vvmcb
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 08:57:34 +0100
Message-ID: <C9FBDD7E.2D7D5%keir@xen.org>
References: <4DD393D9.70605@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DD393D9.70605@amd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 18/05/2011 10:39, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:

> 
> Rename the virtual vmcb from ns_vmcb to vvmcb to
> make it easier for the reader what is meant.

I don't think vvmcb is a good idea. It's too close to vmcb. I think the
current name is actually okay, at least it is clearly distinct from anything
else. And you use the ns_ prefix quite consistently everywhere -- just
switching this one name would be weird.

 -- Keir

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>