From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem_event: Allow memory access listener to
	perform single step execution
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:41:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CA072A8A.2E074%keir@xen.org>
References: <BANLkTikGHg=3S5NXHjG2vcv+sKw1atr8PA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikGHg=3S5NXHjG2vcv+sKw1atr8PA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh@virtuata.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 28/05/2011 18:48, "Aravindh Puthiyaparambil" <aravindh@virtuata.com>
wrote:

> Sorry about the build breakage. I will test the 32-bit side of things
> also in the future.
> 
> I did not realize VCPU pausing was nestable. So even after the
> vcpu_unpause() in hvm_debug_op(), the VCPU will still be paused
> because of the vcpu_pause() in p2m_mem_access_check()?

Yes that's right.

 -- Keir

> If that is the
> case I am fine with the combination for 4.1.1.