From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"mark.langsdorf@amd.com" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use per-cpu variables in cpufreq
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 08:31:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA0A57D8.1B4DE%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1505CA61C06B3@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 31/05/2011 02:51, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, there is a difference between logical and physical cpu hotplug. Xen is
>> capable of bringing CPUs online and offline without them actually being
>> physically plugged/unplugged from the mainboard. Indeed our physical hotplug
>> support is relatively new and I would suspect not much used (and it supports
>> only physical insertion, not removal!).
>>
>> Frankly there are a number of questions around CPUs that are physically
>> plugged in after boot:
>> * How does per-CPU ACPI state like PM info get set up?
>
> A hotplug-able cpu still has an ACPI CPU object in DSDT table, which may exist
> in original DSDT table, or dynamically loaded later upon hotplug event. Once
> dom0 ACPI recognizes a new CPU object, it will notify Xen about discovered
> pm information.
Thanks. I guessed there was probably some magic for this.
-- Keir
>> * In a system where TSCs are otherwise all perfectly in sync, does the
>> firmware help us by setting up the new CPUs' TSCs likewise?
>
> Here what firmware can do is similar to what Xen can do, which can't ensure
> you a truly synchronized TSC on new CPU.
>
> Thanks
> Kevin
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-31 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-27 11:11 [PATCH] use per-cpu variables in cpufreq Juergen Gross
2011-05-27 13:11 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-27 13:29 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-28 7:52 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-30 5:47 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-30 9:45 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-31 1:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-31 7:31 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2011-05-31 7:37 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-05-30 8:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-30 15:33 ` Liu, Jinsong
2011-06-10 19:00 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2011-06-14 9:04 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA0A57D8.1B4DE%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).