xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>,
	Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: slow xp hibernation revisited
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 09:30:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA0FABBE.2E4A9%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01D57761@trantor>

On 04/06/2011 09:05, "James Harper" <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au> wrote:

>> 
>> On 04/06/2011 08:38, "James Harper" <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>
> wrote:
>> 
>>> Looking past the test_bit call, the next statement does another test
> and
>>> sets last_address_index to 0 and returns NULL. Is this just to
> ensure
>>> that the next access isn't just trivially accepted?
>> 
>> Yes, first test is on a potentially stale bucket. Second test is on a
> fresh
>> bucket.
>> 
> 
> How about the following patch? Is munmap the correct way to unmap or is
> an IOCTL required too?
> 
> The exit condition is what would happen anyway after the remap is done
> and the page is still invalid.

Looks fine to me, although maybe the function needs refactoring a little. Cc
Stefano and Ian who are more involved in qemu maintenance.

Also, looking at qemu_map_cache() now, the early exit at the top of the
function looks a bit bogus to me. It exits successfully if we hit the same
address_index as last invocation, even though we might be hitting a
different pfn within the indexed range, and a possibly invalid/unmapped pfn
at that.

 -- Keir

> diff --git a/hw/xen_machine_fv.c b/hw/xen_machine_fv.c
> index d02e23f..1ff80bb 100644
> --- a/hw/xen_machine_fv.c
> +++ b/hw/xen_machine_fv.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,24 @@ uint8_t *qemu_map_cache(target_phys_addr_t
> phys_addr, uint8_t lock)
>          pentry->next = entry;
>          qemu_remap_bucket(entry, address_index);
>      } else if (!entry->lock) {
> +        if (entry->vaddr_base && entry->paddr_index == address_index &&
> !test_bit(address_offset>>XC_PAGE_SHIFT, entry->valid_mapping))
> +        {
> +            /* The page was invalid previously. Test if it is valid now
> and only remap if so */
> +            xen_pfn_t pfn;
> +            int err;
> +            void *tmp_vaddr;
> +
> +            pfn = phys_addr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
> +            tmp_vaddr = xc_map_foreign_bulk(xc_handle, domid,
> PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, &pfn, &err, 1);
> +            if (tmp_vaddr)
> +                munmap(tmp_vaddr, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +            if (!tmp_vaddr || err)
> +            {
> +                last_address_index = ~0UL;
> +                return NULL;
> +            }
> +        }
>          if (!entry->vaddr_base || entry->paddr_index != address_index
> || !test_bit(address_offset>>XC_PAGE_SHIFT, entry->valid_mapping))
>              qemu_remap_bucket(entry, address_index);
>      }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-04  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-03 15:34 slow xp hibernation revisited James Harper
2011-06-03 15:43 ` Tim Deegan
2011-06-04  3:16   ` James Harper
2011-06-04  4:46   ` James Harper
2011-06-04  4:54     ` James Harper
2011-06-04  6:39       ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-04  7:38         ` James Harper
2011-06-04  7:51           ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-04  8:05             ` James Harper
2011-06-04  8:30               ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2011-06-06 13:58                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-21 17:05                   ` Ian Jackson
2011-06-21 18:00                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-04  8:33               ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-06 13:09               ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-06 13:26                 ` James Harper
2011-06-06 13:29                   ` James Harper
2011-06-06 13:38                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-06 13:35                   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA0FABBE.2E4A9%keir@xen.org \
    --to=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
    --cc=james.harper@bendigoit.com.au \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).