From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: HYBRID: PV in HVM container Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:46:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20110627185100.5f8fe247@mantra.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110627185100.5f8fe247@mantra.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Mukesh Rathor Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 28/06/2011 02:51, "Mukesh Rathor" wrote: >> To be clear, you intend for this to work with unmodified PV guests, >> right? All of this translation can easily be done in Xen, avoiding >> multiple paths needed in the guest kernel (not really tenable for >> upstreaming). >> >> -- Keir > > Hi Keir, > > Actually, I modified the PVops guest. The changes in the pvops are > minimal and mostly confied to xen specific files. So I think it has > a fair shot of being upstreamed, at least, worth a shot. I will run > them by Jeremy/Konrad and get their opinions. Well, maybe. But we now have HVM guests, PV guests, and PV-HVM guests. I'm not sure that adding explicitly HVM-PV guests as well isn't just a bloody mess. -- Keir > thanks > Mukesh >