From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:27:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CA7E772F.1FD9C%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <CAP8mzPP0oUmbfBMWuWW7c98QP_Ji41yZvVd9E-jKBssepYWYKg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8mzPP0oUmbfBMWuWW7c98QP_Ji41yZvVd9E-jKBssepYWYKg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@gmail.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Carsten Schiers <carsten@schiers.de>, Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni@heliman.it>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 27/08/2011 10:10, "Shriram Rajagopalan" <rshriram@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> wrote:
>> (xen-devel added to the CC)
>>=20
>> Carsten Schiers writes ("AW: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?"):
>>> Hi Keir, did you intentionally left these out for 4.1.2?
>>>=20
>>> They improve usability of xl toolstack as xend replacement.
>>>=20
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/0648846b4d17
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/2ae357405850
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/c2995f0555af
>>=20
>> I'm happy with all of these being backported.
>>=20
>> The first two apply cleanly to 4.1-testing. =A0Keir, should I port them
>> across or do you have a clever backport script ?
>> =A0=20
>> The last one, c2995f0555af, has conflicts. =A0Carsten, would you care to
>> post a version against 4.1 ?
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Ian.
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>=20
> Keir,
> =A0I would like to backport the following fixes and patches related to Remu=
s.
>=20
> 1. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/c8ae80a11d47
> 2. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/29d81623dc14
> 3. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/b04e57ec4671
> 4. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/62c0dfc9efbf
> 5. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/ecff559bf474
> 6. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/15fc211a13bf
>=20
> Patches 2-6 apply cleanly against 4.1-testing. Patch 1 does not apply cle=
anly
> as it has some content that I didn't post, but seems to have gotten in wh=
ile
> IanJ was committing it (something related to
> tools/python/xen/xm/messages/xen-xm.pot).

I'll leave it to Ian Jackson to backport these if he agrees with your
choices.

 -- Keir

> shriram
>=20
>=20