From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Release candidates for Xen 4.1.2 and 4.0.3
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:53:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CA7E8B56.1FDA6%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <CAP8mzPO8vWHMOqD4kc28zaGT1bViSp8SzfzCVsNRW-0dOQh79Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8mzPO8vWHMOqD4kc28zaGT1bViSp8SzfzCVsNRW-0dOQh79Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: rshriram@cs.ubc.ca
Cc: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 27/08/2011 11:04, "Shriram Rajagopalan" <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> When the repository passes the automated regression tests. Should be lat=
er
>> today.
>>=20
>> =A0-- Keir
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 25/08/2011 13:19, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> When tag appear in http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-4.1-testing.hg/ ?
>>>=20
>>> Boris.
>>>=20
>>> --- On Thu, 8/25/11, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Release candidates for Xen 4.1.2 and 4.0.3
>>>> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> Date: Thursday, August 25, 2011, 7:01 AM
>>>>=20
>>>> Folks,
>>>>=20
>>>> First release candidiates are now tagged in the 40 and 4.1 branches as
>>>> follows:
>>>>=20
>>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.0-testing.hg (4.0.3-rc1)
>>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.1-testing.hg (4.1.2-rc1)
>>>>=20
>>>> Please test, and let me know if there are any missing urgent backports=
 for
>>>> these stable branches.
>>>>=20
>>>> =A0Thanks,
>>>> =A0Keir
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> </mc/compose?to=3DXen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>=20
>=20
> Hi Keir,
> =A0Can you please backport the following patches:
> 1. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/13ec53a59a42
> 2. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/29d81623dc14
> 3. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/b04e57ec4671
> 4. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/62c0dfc9efbf
> 5. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/ecff559bf474
> 6. http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/15fc211a13bf
>=20
> All of these apply cleanly against 4.0-testing.

Ian Jackson deals with toolstack backports. I get the feeling I'm talking t=
o
myself. I'm just going to ignore toolstack backport requests that are
addressed to me, from now on.

 -- Keir

> shriram
>=20