From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other
	hypervisor IPIs
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:14:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CA8E45EA.3137C%keir@xen.org>
References: <4E6886A3.3060402@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6886A3.3060402@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "xiantao.zhang@intel.com" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 08/09/2011 10:10, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:

>> Andrew: I think we have to leave this vector where it is, but you could add
>> a comment explaining why it is so, in your cleanup patchset.
>> 
>>  -- Keir 
> 
> Wow I was having a slow day - I was thinking that
> IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR was the first high priority vector.
> 
> In which case it should probably stay at its current vector, but
> FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR should probably be bumped up, as it is no longer a
> vector dynamically allocated to guests.

Sounds reasonable.

 -- Keir