From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: 4.0/4.1 requests
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:29:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA8E65AA.31389%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E68B13D020000780005544F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 08/09/2011 11:12, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 08.09.11 at 11:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> Hi Keir,
>>
>> without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should
>> really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI
>> migrating line interrupts") in both trees.
>>
>> I'd also like you to add 23820:ba75234a6f56 ("bitmap_scnlistprintf()
>> should always zero-terminate its output buffer") to 4.0 (I see it's
>> already in 4.1), as this not being fixed confuses 'e' debug key output.
>
> Also shouldn't we have a backport of 23112:84e3706df07a ("Passthrough:
> disable bus-mastering on any card that causes an IOMMU fault.") in the
> 4.0 tree (even if it doesn't fully address the problem, yet - that's the
> case in the other trees too)?
Now done.
-- Keir
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-08 9:19 4.0/4.1 requests Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 11:29 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2011-09-08 10:17 ` Keir Fraser
2011-09-08 10:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-08 11:11 ` Keir Fraser
2011-09-08 11:44 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 13:18 ` 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-08 13:40 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-08 13:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 15:06 ` Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v2 [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 15:39 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-09 15:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 16:03 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-09 16:22 ` Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v3 [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 16:47 ` Re: 4.0/4.1 requests - IO-APIC EOI v4 [RFC] Andrew Cooper
2011-09-09 16:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-12 6:50 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-12 10:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-09-12 10:23 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-12 11:30 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA8E65AA.31389%keir@xen.org \
--to=keir@xen.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).