xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bharat gohil <ghl.bhrt@gmail.com>
To: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@gmail.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: ARM64:Porting xen to new hardware
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:00:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABdg74cNpcfc9Rr1DqtC07GN1fwFTPJ_ON2d3dYvcF9kORBXhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPD2p-=638FBRggLkGGJYqByo3-oekB7h--1qJo4ybAGyfC6UA@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5282 bytes --]

Hello Oleksandr,
Thank you very much for your input.

Yes. agree. I will check by removing A72 core from DT.

Thanks,
Bharat

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Not sure that I am a competent person, just my assumptions.
>
> CCed ARM guys.
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:21 PM, bharat gohil <ghl.bhrt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello All
> >
> > I am trying to run Xen on new hardware which has two A35 and one A72
> core.
> > Xen booted intially but it hangs at smp_call_function(setup_virt_
> paging_one,
> > (void *)val, 1) function call.
>
> It might be a consequence of that CPU cores are different. And they
> might have different set of features, or even settings.
> And these features/settings the boot CPU has don't compatible with
> other (non-boot) CPUs.
> Can you try not to bringup A72 core (remove it from DT or another
> way), leave only two A35 and see what will happen.
>
> > Find following log of Xen booting,same set of features.
> >
> > - UART enabled -
> > - CPU 00000000 booting -
> > - Current EL 00000008 -
> > - Xen starting at EL2 -
> > - Zero BSS -
> > - Setting up control registers -
> > - Turning on paging -
> > - Ready -
> > (XEN) Checking for initrd in /chosen
> > (XEN) RAM: 0000000040000000 - 00000000bfffffff
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN) MODULE[0]: 0000000044000000 - 000000004400fd5a Device Tree
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN) Command line: <NULL>
> Why? Does your device-tree have bootargs?
>
> > (XEN) Placing Xen at 0x00000000bfe00000-0x00000000c0000000
> > (XEN) Update BOOTMOD_XEN from 0000000040080000-0000000040194e01 =>
> > 00000000bfe01
> > (XEN) Domain heap initialised
> > (XEN) Booting using Device Tree
> > (XEN) Platform: Generic System
> > (XEN) Taking dtuart configuration from /chosen/stdout-path
> > (XEN) Looking for dtuart at "serial0", options ""
> >  __  __            _  _    _  ___                     _        _     _
> >  \ \/ /___ _ __   | || |  / |/ _ \    _   _ _ __  ___| |_ __ _| |__ | |
> ___
> >   \  // _ \ '_ \  | || |_ | | | | |__| | | | '_ \/ __| __/ _` | '_ \| |/
> _ \
> >   /  \  __/ | | | |__   _|| | |_| |__| |_| | | | \__ \ || (_| | |_) | |
> __/
> >  /_/\_\___|_| |_|    |_|(_)_|\___/    \__,_|_|
> |_|___/\__\__,_|_.__/|_|\___|
> >
> > (XEN) Xen version 4.10-unstable (bgohil@) (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
> > (Ubuntu/Linaro7
> > (XEN) Latest ChangeSet: Fri Aug 11 19:02:51 2017 +0100 git:9053a74-dirty
> > (XEN) Processor: 410fd041: "ARM Limited", variant: 0x0, part 0xd04, rev
> 0x1
> > (XEN) 64-bit Execution:
> > (XEN)   Processor Features: 0000000000002222 0000000000000000
> > (XEN)     Exception Levels: EL3:64+32 EL2:64+32 EL1:64+32 EL0:64+32
> > (XEN)     Extensions: FloatingPoint AdvancedSIMD
> > (XEN)   Debug Features: 0000000010305106 0000000000000000
> > (XEN)   Auxiliary Features: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > (XEN)   Memory Model Features: 0000000000101122 0000000000000000
> > (XEN)   ISA Features:  0000000000011120 0000000000000000
> > (XEN) 32-bit Execution:
> > (XEN)   Processor Features: 00000131:00011011
> > (XEN)     Instruction Sets: AArch32 A32 Thumb Thumb-2 Jazelle
> > (XEN)     Extensions: GenericTimer Security
> > (XEN)   Debug Features: 03010066
> > (XEN)   Auxiliary Features: 00000000
> > (XEN)   Memory Model Features: 10201105 40000000 01260000 02102211
> > (XEN)  ISA Features: 02101110 13112111 21232042 01112131 00011142
> 00011121
> > (XEN) Using PSCI-1.0 for SMP bringup
> > (XEN) SMP: Allowing 3 CPUs
> > (XEN) Generic Timer IRQ: phys=30 hyp=26 virt=27 Freq: 13000 KHz
> > (XEN) GICv2: WARNING: The GICC size is too small: 0x1000 expected 0x2000
> Sounds like GIC settings are not completely correct.
> Wrong GIC settings might lead to that IPIs won't work as expected. And
> boot CPU will
> get stuck waiting for another CPU.
> Just double check.
>
> > (XEN) GICv2 initialization:
> > (XEN)         gic_dist_addr=0000000010510000
> > (XEN)         gic_cpu_addr=0000000010520000
> > (XEN)         gic_hyp_addr=0000000010540000
> > (XEN)         gic_vcpu_addr=0000000010560000
> > (XEN)         gic_maintenance_irq=25
> > (XEN) GICv2: 384 lines, 6 cpus, secure (IID 0200143b).
> > (XEN) Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit)
> > (XEN) Allocated console ring of 32 KiB.
> > (XEN) Bringing up CPU1
> > - CPU 00000001 booting -
> > - Current EL 00000008 -
> > - Xen starting at EL2 -
> > - Setting up control registers -
> > - Turning on paging -
> > - Ready -
> > (XEN) CPU 1 booted.
> > (XEN) Bringing up CPU2
> > - CPU 00000200 booting -
> > - Current EL 00000008 -
> > - Xen starting at EL2 -
> > - Setting up control registers -
> > - Turning on paging -
> > - Ready -
> > (XEN) CPU 2 booted.
> > (XEN) Brought up 3 CPUs
> > (XEN) P2M: 40-bit IPA with 40-bit PA and 8-bit VMID
> > (XEN) P2M: 3 levels with order-1 root, VTCR 0x80023558
> >
> > Can anyone guide me how to debug this problem or what could be wrong
> here?
> >
> > It looks, writing into VTCR_EL2 hang the system.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Bharat Gohil
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>



-- 
Regards,
Bharat Gohil
Sr.Software Engineer
bharat.gohil@harman.com
+919427054633

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7168 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29 14:21 ARM64:Porting xen to new hardware bharat gohil
2017-08-30 14:14 ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2017-08-30 14:30   ` bharat gohil [this message]
2017-08-31 11:13     ` bharat gohil
2017-08-31 11:58       ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2017-09-04  4:13         ` bharat gohil
2017-09-04 12:54           ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2017-09-06  7:01             ` bharat gohil
2017-09-06 10:19               ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2017-09-07 13:30                 ` bharat gohil
2017-09-08 19:19                   ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2017-09-18 14:46                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-09-22 10:00                       ` bharat gohil
2017-09-22 13:43                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-09-25  8:42                           ` bharat gohil
2017-09-25 12:15                             ` Andrii Anisov
2017-09-25 12:53                               ` bharat gohil
2017-09-25 13:29                                 ` Julien Grall
2017-09-25 17:40                                   ` bharat gohil
2017-09-25 18:08                                     ` Oleksandr Tyshchenko
2017-09-29  8:15                                       ` bharat gohil
2017-09-29 17:42                                         ` Julien Grall
2017-10-03  7:05                                           ` bharat gohil
2017-10-06 13:29                                             ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22  8:43                                               ` bharat gohil
2018-02-22  9:45                                                 ` bharat gohil
2018-02-22 10:33                                                   ` bharat gohil
2018-02-22 10:38                                                     ` bharat gohil
2018-02-22 11:01                                                     ` Andrii Anisov
2018-02-22 11:20                                                       ` Julien Grall
2018-02-22 11:11                                                     ` Andrii Anisov
2018-02-22 11:27                                                     ` Julien Grall
2018-02-26  7:31                                                       ` bharat gohil
2018-02-26 10:21                                                         ` Julien Grall
2018-02-26 13:09                                                           ` bharat gohil
2017-09-25 13:30                                 ` Andrii Anisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABdg74cNpcfc9Rr1DqtC07GN1fwFTPJ_ON2d3dYvcF9kORBXhg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ghl.bhrt@gmail.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=olekstysh@gmail.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).