From: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>
To: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@bitdefender.com>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] hvm/svm: Enable Breakpoint events
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 08:42:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABfawhnSRkPwn089o4zTJAsfF3TV5c=DkuKTkJrN0L3m5qu7fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1517564259-32305-3-git-send-email-aisaila@bitdefender.com>
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Alexandru Isaila
<aisaila@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> This commit enables the breakpoint events for svm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@bitdefender.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> index dcbd550..14a5f60 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
> #include <asm/hap.h>
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/debugger.h>
> +#include <asm/hvm/monitor.h>
> #include <asm/xstate.h>
>
> void svm_asm_do_resume(void);
> @@ -1079,7 +1080,8 @@ static void svm_ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *v)
> static void noreturn svm_do_resume(struct vcpu *v)
> {
> struct vmcb_struct *vmcb = v->arch.hvm_svm.vmcb;
> - bool_t debug_state = v->domain->debugger_attached;
> + bool_t debug_state = v->domain->debugger_attached
> + || v->domain->arch.monitor.software_breakpoint_enabled;
> bool_t vcpu_guestmode = 0;
> struct vlapic *vlapic = vcpu_vlapic(v);
>
> @@ -2407,6 +2409,23 @@ static bool svm_get_pending_event(struct vcpu *v, struct x86_event *info)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static void svm_propagate_intr(struct vcpu *v, unsigned long insn_len)
> +{
> + struct vmcb_struct *vmcb = v->arch.hvm_svm.vmcb;
> + struct x86_event event = {
> + .vector = vmcb->eventinj.fields.type,
> + .type = vmcb->eventinj.fields.type,
> + .error_code = vmcb->exitinfo1,
> + };
> +
> + if ( event.type >= X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT )
> + event.insn_len = insn_len;seems
> + else
> + event.insn_len = 0;
> +
> + hvm_inject_event(&event);
> +}
> +
> static struct hvm_function_table __initdata svm_function_table = {
> .name = "SVM",
> .cpu_up_prepare = svm_cpu_up_prepare,
> @@ -2619,14 +2638,31 @@ void svm_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> break;
>
> case VMEXIT_EXCEPTION_BP:
> - if ( !v->domain->debugger_attached )
> - goto unexpected_exit_type;
> - /* AMD Vol2, 15.11: INT3, INTO, BOUND intercepts do not update RIP. */
> - if ( (inst_len = __get_instruction_length(v, INSTR_INT3)) == 0 )
> + inst_len = __get_instruction_length(v, INSTR_INT3);
> +
> + if ( inst_len == 0 )
> break;
> - __update_guest_eip(regs, inst_len);
> - current->arch.gdbsx_vcpu_event = TRAP_int3;
> - domain_pause_for_debugger();
> +
> + if ( !v->domain->debugger_attached )
I think this would be easier to follow if you switched it around.
> + {
> + /* AMD Vol2, 15.11: INT3, INTO, BOUND intercepts do not update RIP. */
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = hvm_monitor_debug(regs->rip,
> + HVM_MONITOR_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT,
> + X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_EXCEPTION,
> + inst_len);
> + if ( rc < 0 )
> + goto unexpected_exit_type;
> + if ( !rc )
> + svm_propagate_intr(v, inst_len);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + __update_guest_eip(regs, inst_len);
> + current->arch.gdbsx_vcpu_event = TRAP_int3;
> + domain_pause_for_debugger();
> + }
> break;
>
> case VMEXIT_EXCEPTION_NM:
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h
> index 3706b7a..68a210a 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/monitor.h
> @@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ static inline uint32_t arch_monitor_get_capabilities(struct domain *d)
> }
> else if ( cpu_has_svm )
> {
> - capabilities = (1U << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_GUEST_REQUEST);
> + capabilities = (1U << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_GUEST_REQUEST) |
> + (1U << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT);
Since breakpoints are also supported for both svm and vmx, you can
just set it once, no need for the extra if block.
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-02 9:37 [PATCH v1 0/4] hvm/svm: Enable vm events for SVM Alexandru Isaila
2018-02-02 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] asm-x86/monitor: Enable svm monitor events Alexandru Isaila
2018-02-02 15:38 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2018-02-02 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] hvm/svm: Enable Breakpoint events Alexandru Isaila
2018-02-02 15:42 ` Tamas K Lengyel [this message]
2018-02-05 9:52 ` Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2018-02-02 15:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-02-02 16:27 ` Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2018-02-02 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] hvm/svm: Enable MSR events Alexandru Isaila
2018-02-02 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] hvm/svm: Enable CR events Alexandru Isaila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABfawhnSRkPwn089o4zTJAsfF3TV5c=DkuKTkJrN0L3m5qu7fw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=aisaila@bitdefender.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).