xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Meng Xu <xumengpanda@gmail.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: Artem Mygaiev <artem.mygaiev@globallogic.com>,
	Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	"dongxiao.xu@intel.com" <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>,
	"mengxu@cis.upenn.edu" <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>,
	"feng.wu@intel.com" <feng.wu@intel.com>,
	"zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com" <zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com>,
	Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@linaro.org>,
	"Paul.Skentzos@dornerworks.com" <Paul.Skentzos@dornerworks.com>,
	"wency@cn.fujitsu.com" <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"rcojocaru@bitdefender.com" <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	"guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com" <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com"
	<Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Joshua Whitehead <josh.whitehead@dornerworks.com>,
	"zoltan.kiss@citrix.com" <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>,
	Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
	"yang.z.zhang@intel.com" <yan>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update (July update)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:40:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAENZ-+nZxDkkTGPRxtbSFN6g1fhsrR6xmNoDMSWKXcreQ-VVdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408528434.3725.82.camel@Solace.lan>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2128 bytes --]

Hi Dario,


> >
> >         The "prognosis" is now the likelihood of completion in the 4.5
> >         timeframe.
> >         A bunch of items had moved to the completed phase which is
> >         fantastic.
> >
> >         none - nothing yet
> >         fair - still working on it, patches are prototypes or RFC
> >         ok   - patches posted, acting on review
> >         good - some last minute pieces
> >         done - all done, might have bugs
> >
> >
> >
> >         *  XenRT (Preemptive Global Earliest Deadline First) (fair)
> >            RFC patch posted (v2)
> >           -  Meng Xu
> >
>
> > Although it's a RFC patch, the XenRT can actually works well on the
> > machines we have. It currently has the preemptive global EDF
> > scheduler. The functionalities I'm currently working on is improving
> > its performance based on the review of the first version of patches.
> >
> If this is the case, I think you should drop the RFC tag/status.
>
> The idea is this: if you are asking the Xen dev community to provide
> some feedback on an idea/prototype implementation, then keep the RFC
> tag. If you are proposing something for inclusion in upstream Xen and,
> at least according to your own opinion, the code you are submitting is
> good enough to be included, then you need to drop the RFC tag.
>
> Then, of course, there will still be reviews, changes will be requested,
> new versions, etc., but it's important to mark the difference between
> these two phases, as said, by either retaining or dripping the tag.
>
> Basing on what you're saying (i.e., that you're working on performances
> optimizations), on how the last patch series looked and on the comments
> you got, I think it would be fine for you to send the next round of
> patches as proper v1, rather than "RFC v3", but that's, of course, up to
> you. :-)
>

​Thank you very much for your advice! I will drop the RFC then in the next
round of patches (this week).

Best,

Meng ​

-- 


-----------
Meng Xu
PhD Student in Computer and Information Science
University of Pennsylvania

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3041 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-20 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-15 17:23 Xen 4.5 development update (July update) konrad.wilk
2014-08-15 17:58 ` Don Slutz
2014-08-15 19:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-15 19:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-15 21:19     ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-16  0:31 ` Meng Xu
2014-08-20  9:53   ` Dario Faggioli
2014-08-20 13:40     ` Meng Xu [this message]
2014-08-19 16:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-08-21 19:17   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-02 20:45 konrad.wilk
2014-09-02 21:25 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-03 10:09   ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-03 10:13     ` Wei Liu
2014-09-03 11:27     ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-03 11:53   ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2014-09-03 11:58     ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-03 19:54   ` Julien Grall
2014-09-09 14:04     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-03  1:17 ` Hongyang Yang
2014-09-03 12:05   ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2014-09-03  1:23 ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-09-03 12:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-03 15:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-03 15:53 ` Roy Franz
2014-09-09  9:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-09 10:30   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-09 14:09     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-09 14:30       ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-09 15:48         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-09 14:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-09 13:51 ` Meng Xu
2014-09-09 17:02   ` Dario Faggioli
2014-07-23  0:28 konrad.wilk
2014-07-23  0:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-23 16:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23  8:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-07-23  9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-23 10:20   ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 12:54     ` Don Slutz
2014-07-23 13:03       ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 18:34         ` Don Slutz
2014-07-24 11:21           ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 13:42     ` Fabio Fantoni
2014-07-23 13:45       ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-23 13:55         ` Fabio Fantoni
2014-07-23 17:02     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-24 11:23       ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-25 17:22         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23 16:18   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-23 16:43     ` Ian Campbell
2014-07-28 17:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-08-04 15:44   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
     [not found] ` <1406569210.4038.28.camel@Solace>
     [not found]   ` <CAENZ-+=pABtLnOU1CE8nHYd48S0_pB4cggLz1zrqQq2V1pcA-w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-07-29  1:37     ` Meng Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAENZ-+nZxDkkTGPRxtbSFN6g1fhsrR6xmNoDMSWKXcreQ-VVdg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xumengpanda@gmail.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Paul.Skentzos@dornerworks.com \
    --cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=artem.mygaiev@globallogic.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=dongxiao.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=josh.whitehead@dornerworks.com \
    --cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=parth.dixit@linaro.org \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).