From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Poor performance with Linux 3.x as dom0 Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:32:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4FA1328B.6070602@hfp.de> <4FA13708.4050202@cantab.net> <4FA16875.5020801@hfp.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FA16875.5020801@hfp.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andreas Kinzler Cc: David Vrabel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Andreas Kinzler wrote: > On 02.05.2012 15:30, David Vrabel wrote: >> >> Can you apply 7eb7ce4d2e8991aff4ecb71a81949a907ca755ac "xen: correctly >> check for pending events when restoring irq flags"[1] and see how much >> it helps? > > > There is some minor improvement - but it is still far away from xenified > 2.6.34.10. Just FYI, the reason Ian suggested making the same comparison for native is that the performance of linux overall on bare-metal has also suffered since 2.6.34. It's likely that a non-trivial amount of the performance regression is due to moving from 2.6.34 to 3.{2,3}, over and above whatever regressions may have happened when moving from xenified to pvops. -George