From: Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: dump with xen-unstable & linux 3.2.17
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:55:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOvdn6XbSf70-9NQft6nyT7Mgt-azs1wfAeyCn=d1tabFkWSYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120522173403.GD19601@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Are you referring to kernel, or Xen patches?
I'm currently seeing the issue in question with the xen-unstable tip
none of our patches pushed...
...or are you suggesting that the patch, as committed is incorrect?
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:21:20PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> good point.
>>
>> I'll continue to try to figure this out - but if you have anything
>> specific I can try (particular boot options, or a patch with extra
>> debugging in interesting areas) please let me know, as it is 100%
>> reproducible in my environment right now.
>
> So.. you mentioned that you are using the serial console and that
> there were some changes in the hypervisor to deal with the serial console.
>
> I sent to xen-devel some of the patches that you guys had (with
> proper authorship) - especially the one dealing with PCI serial cards.
> Jan found that one of them had an simple mistake of trying to use
> the ports before they were initialized and fixed that in xen-unstable.
> Perhaps that is missing?
>
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On 22.05.12 at 17:38, Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net> wrote:
>> >> I still suspect this is something my dom0 kernel is doing incorrectly,
>> >> but I don't have much to back that up other than a gut feeling.
>> >
>> > If the Dom0 kernel can affect the scheduler in this way, then
>> > quite likely a DomU kernel can too. And even if not, it's still a
>> > problem - the scheduler just shouldn't be susceptible.
>> >
>> > Jan
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 21:20 dump with xen-unstable & linux 3.2.17 Ben Guthro
2012-05-21 14:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-21 19:12 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-21 19:49 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 15:38 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-22 16:21 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 17:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-22 17:55 ` Ben Guthro [this message]
2012-05-22 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-22 18:26 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-22 21:00 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-23 9:39 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-23 11:00 ` Juergen Gross
2012-05-25 13:20 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-31 15:52 ` Ben Guthro
2012-05-31 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-31 16:18 ` Ben Guthro
2012-06-01 6:54 ` Dietmar Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOvdn6XbSf70-9NQft6nyT7Mgt-azs1wfAeyCn=d1tabFkWSYQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ben@guthro.net \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).