From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shriram Rajagopalan Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] X86/vMCE: guest broken page handling when migration Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:26:32 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20609.28264.158580.995717@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20613.9696.715106.47187@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Reply-To: rshriram@cs.ubc.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5415581938582293538==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20613.9696.715106.47187@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , "Liu, Jinsong" Cc: Christoph Egger , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Keir (Xen.org)" , Ian Campbell , George Dunlap , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============5415581938582293538== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9a3e32760f104ccaad715 --0016e6d9a3e32760f104ccaad715 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] X86/vMCE: guest broken > page handling when migration"): > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ian Jackson > wrote: > > > This looks plausible to me, as far as the tools go. Can you explain > > > how you have tested this ? Did you manage to do any tests of the > > > remus codepaths ? > > > > I'm pretty sure that this shouldn't cause any problems with Remus. If > > it's difficult for Jinsong to test Remus, I think probably OK to > > commit it, and then revert it if the Remus guys have any problems. > > OK. > > You can easily test it with Remus. With xl, memory replication functionality is already in place. so xl remus command should work. If you are running it with Xend, run Remus with --no-net option. shriram > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > --0016e6d9a3e32760f104ccaad715 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Ian Jackson &l= t;Ian.Jackso= n@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] = [PATCH 5/5] X86/vMCE: guest broken page handling when migration"):
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>= wrote:
> > This looks plausible to me, as far as the= tools go. =A0Can you explain
> > how you have tested this ? =A0Did you manage to do any tests of t= he
> > remus codepaths ?
>
> I'm pretty sure that this shouldn't cause any problems with Re= mus. =A0If
> it's difficult for Jinsong to test Remus, I think probably OK to > commit it, and then revert it if the Remus guys have any problems.

OK.


You can easily test it with Remus. With xl, memory replic= ation functionality is already
in place. so xl remus command should wor= k.

If you are running it with Xend, run Remus=A0with --no-net op= tion.

shriram
=A0
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.x= en.org/xen-devel

--0016e6d9a3e32760f104ccaad715-- --===============5415581938582293538== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============5415581938582293538==--