From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libxl: add support for yajl 2.x Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:58:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1324637401.7877.144.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1324637401.7877.144.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: Roger Pau =?ISO-8859-1?B?TW9ubuk=?= , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/12/2011 10:50, "Ian Campbell" wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 08:40 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: >> On 23/12/2011 08:22, "Roger Pau Monn=E9" wrote: >> = >>> 2011/12/22 Ian Campbell : >>>> I'm not going to have time in the near future. >>> = >>> I will try to take a look at the autogoo stuff and set something up. >>> = >>>> Would it be sufficient to have the stuff in tools/check create a >>>> config.h as well as doing the checks? Might need a bit of Makefile mag= ic >>>> to be sure that check is always run? >>> = >>> Since we have to change things, I'm not sure if it is best to move to >>> something more standard, like autotools. >> = >> We should probably just do autotools, if someone has the time to invest = in >> the initial implementation work to use it. > = > You are thinking of autoconf only right? We don't want to go the whole > hog and start using automake and all the other bobbins (libtool etc), do > we? You're probably right. > Ian. > =